When you got married last year, you changed your last name from Yustman to Annable. Has that been confusing for people?

Yeah, I think some people are a little confused. But for the most part, people know that I just got married and they’re putting two and two together. I’m actually having my one year anniversary next week—we made it one year! Oh my God!

How are you and Dave going to celebrate your one-year anniversary on Monday?

We’re actually going to be in New York for one of Dave’s best friends’ wedding. I think that’s the best way to celebrate—at another wedding!

Your husband recently told Us Weekly that he knows he has to buy you something for your anniversary or he’ll be in big trouble! What’s the best present he could give you on your anniversary?

Not to fight with me for a whole year! {Laughs}. Always agree with me…

And what will you be getting Dave?

You know, I’ve been thinking about this because it’s coming up and i haven’t gotten him anything. People say the first year you get him a paper gift—I don’t really know what that means. I guess we’re just going to have to talk—we were like, ‘what do you want?’ I mean, do you have any suggestions?

You should get him something Latin!

I should, right? I should get him…well, more Rosetta Stone to learn Spanish! That was one of our wedding vows—I said, ‘do you promise to learn Spanish?’ and he said, “si.” {Laughs}.

Has he really commited to learning Spanish or was he just joking?

No, I think he’s going to commit to it. It’s important to me—I really want to raise my kids speaking Spanish, so he’s got a couple of years to go. Hopefully he’ll get on that.

Magazines like Us Weekly and People cover your and Dave’s every move together, because you’re such a hot, young couple!

If they only knew how boring we actually are! {Laughs}. Dave’s eyes start getting heavy at around 9 p.m. and I’m like, ‘OK, i guess maybe I should follow.’ We’re like an old, boring couple. {Laughs}. But we really should have a reality show following us because our house is very interesting—we’ve got two dogs, we’ve got people in and out of our house all of the time. It’s always like a party. It’s cool.

Source: Latina

As first scooped by our sister site Deadline.com, Brothers & Sisters and Breaking In head-turner Odette Annable is joining House this fall as a series regular.

Annable — the real-life wife of B&S alum Dave Annable — will play someone that House meets while behind bars as the season opens, and ultimately the newest member of Dr. Crankypants’ team, thus filling the void left by both Amber Tamblyn and Olivia Wilde (who’s returning this fall but only for a brief stint).

This is one of two major new roles the Fox hit is adding to its Season 8 ranks. The show is also searching for an actress to succeed Lisa Edelstein as the new Dean of Medicine.

Check Deadline for further details on Annable’s House stay, including what it means for Breaking In‘s possible midseason resurrection.

Source: TV Line

3 Odette Annable (2010 Rank: Unranked)

A year ago she was known as Odette Yustman (the name most people know her by), now it’s Annable. Why? Because she got married to a guy with the last name Annable. Simple, right? But the name change isn’t helping 26 year-old Odette in the recognition department so we thought we’d do her a favor and remind everyone that though she may have a new name, she’s still just as sexy as ever.

Source: Guyism

Her character, Melanie, specializes in lock-picking, safe-cracking and heart-breaking.

In this Good Day LA interview video, Odette talks about the show (of course) and how married life’s treating her and hubby, actor Dave Annable from “Brothers and Sisters.” Six-month anniversary… not bad for a Hollywood marriage!

“Breaking In” airs Wednesday nights at 9:30pm on FOX.

Source: My Fox LA

The 25-year-old actress stars as a safebreaker opposite Christian Slaterin the crime caper which was handy given her background for lock picking.

“I used to do the old Bobby pin trick when I was a kid so I wasn’t entirely new to breaking in,” she said.

“It’s actually a lot easier than you think but I only used to do it in emergencies.”

Odette — who tied the knot withBrothers & Sisters actor Dave Annablein October — recently revealed that she’s gained some newfound wisdom since becoming a wife.

“There’s a lot of great things about being a newlywed,” she said.

“I mean, I’m still in the honeymoon phase, so everything is great and amazing.

“You’re really not going anywhere, so there’s no point in arguing — that’s what we’ve figured out. And your insecurities get cut out a little bit.

“We’ve balanced our work and our personal lives; we really don’t talk about work when we come home.

“We’d get home [after shooting] and talk about just the normal daily things in life.”

Source: Showbiz Spy

The actor wed You Again‘s Odette Yustman Sunday in an outdoor ceremony attended by 215 family members and friends in Ojai, Calif., reps for the couple confirm to UsMagazine.com.

Walking down the aisle to the tune of “All You Need Is Love” by The Beatles, Yustman donned a Monique Lhuillier gown. Annable, clad in a DKNY suit, stood with best man and costar Matthew Rhys. Brothers and Sisters‘Ron Rifkin officiated the ceremony.

Annable, 31, who stars as Justin on the ABC series, popped the question to his girlfriend of two years, 25, over Valentine’s Day weekend.

“I [proposed] at a place where we fell in love,” the actor toldUs at the time. “It was in Santa Barbara [Calif.], and I surprised her with her parents and my parents after [the proposal]. We went to the [hotel] restaurant…and our parents were there waiting. It was pretty rad! She was very surprised.”

Prior to their walk down the aisle, the couple hinted that their ceremony would be an extravagant affair — mostly to accommodate “a lot of crazy uncles, drunk aunts, the works!” Annable joked to Us. Added Yustman, “It’ll be a big party.”

Annable and Yustman are excited to start a family of their own.

“I want kids sooner than later,” Annable says.

Source: Us Weekly

ODETTE YUSTMAN
Age: 25
Odette doesn’t look like a 20-year veteran of the acting business. But that’s because she was only five years old when she played a Spanish-speaking child in “Kindergarten Cop” with Arnold Schwarzenegger. As an adult she made a splash getting chased by a giant monster through a darkened New York City in “Cloverfield.” In September, she gets to step into the spotlight with the comedy “You Again” playing the mean girl who terrorized Kristen Bell in high school but is now about to become her sister-in-law.

When Kelly said yes to boyfriend, Luke Worrall, after only dating for six months, she knew he was the one. It seems like the couple was a match made in heaven, from the start, and they both knew instantly that they’d be together forever.

“We’ve been engaged for more than a year now,” Kelly told Life & Style magazine. “It was just something that we talked about and kind of knew was going to happen. I love absolutely everything about him,” she gushed.So, what did the bling look like, and how did he do it? Luke decided to surprise Kelly for her 25th birthday with a sparkly heart-shaped 2-carat diamond ring set on a white gold band. Style expert Michael O’Connor estimates the rock is valued at approximately $35,000. Go Kelly!

But even though Kelly knew Luke would propose, not every star expects it. When “Brothers & Sisters” star Dave Annable popped the question to girlfriend Odette over Valentine’s Day weekend, Odette took a bit of convincing to believe the proposal was real.

“I was shocked,” she recalled to Life & Style. “Dave was pacing around, and after two minutes he asked, ‘So is it a yes or a no?’ It was like a fairy tale. I started doing cartwheels.”

And what did Odette’s rock look like? Dave gave his new bride-to-be a pear-shaped diamond set on a platinum band. O’Connor estimates this dazzling ring weighs 3.5 carats and likely cost $65,000. Wowza!

Source: MTV

Source: People

ShockTillYouDrop.com: With interviews like this, every director we talk to looks back on their film and says, “Oh, I wish I could’ve tweaked this or that…” Do you feel the same way? Or you satisfied…

David Goyer: I’m extremely happy with the box office results. Thrilled. It made a ton of money. [laughs] I’m happy with that. Looking back on it, I was surprised, critically, that reviewers gave me such flack for the Holocaust aspect, which I thought was relatively small. I thought there was a double standard, because I remember thinking, “How is this any different than what they did at the beginning of X-Men?” And nobody gave them flack for that at all. Maybe because we were a horror film it wasn’t cool, and they were a comic book movie, I don’t really know why that was okay and this wasn’t. But I also never said the Holocaust caused the Dibuk, I said it was a place that it allowed it to enter… Anyway, I thought it was interesting. Obviously, I’m sensitive to the Holocaust, but I was surprised people took issue in it in that way. Shock: Re-watching the film on DVD, I honed in on the efficient pace with which you make it move. It’s tight. Twenty minutes in, Yustman’s character is right in the mix of the mystery.

Goyer: It definitely moves fast. Ironically, I remember saying I wanted to do something that was a bit more of a classic, slow burn. It’s not like I was being pushed to trim it shorter, I just ultimately decided it needed to burn as slowly as I thought it could.

Shock: I understand it found a lot of success overseas, too. Why do you think that is?

Goyer: Horror has always traveled incredibly well overseas. I think there were aspects of the story that spanned different continents, spanned different cultures, I also think Gary Oldman is a much bigger star overseas than he is here, and that didn’t hurt. It played incredibly well in a lot of countries. It’s funny, prior to it being released internationally I was looking at how similar films had fared overseas. You’d get a film like Friday the 13th, which has a name and will do well overseas, but not all the comparable horror films do well overseas. In this case, an exorcist film is relatively universal.

Shock: This unrated cut has a little bit more thrown in. Do you oversee what’s put back in versus what will be left for the deleted scenes section?

Goyer: It’s funny, they wanted to do an unrated version. I’ll be honest, there wasn’t a ton of footage I was forced to cut out because of the MPAA, there was some. It wasn’t a case of, “Oh my God, there’s 20 minutes of gore,” or whole scenes I wasn’t able to put in. I was pleasantly surprised by how much of my original in intention I was able to put in. I think we were skirting the bleeding edge of PG-13. I think maybe even next year this film would have gotten an R rating.

Shock: Really?

Goyer: I think the tastes are changing, but I felt this wasn’t quite graphic enough to be an R-rated film. It’s not super graphic but I do think it’s disturbing.

Shock: Right, the MPAA takes issue with “tone,” too.

Goyer: We had the tonal thing as well. Again, when you get into that situation, you get into these sort of Brazil-like arguments about things that had passed through. It’s always a hard call when you’re making a horror film whether or not to make a PG-13 or R-rated film. At the end of the day, I just decided to shoot what I think was appropriate and we’d decide later whether it’s PG-13 or R. When I finished it, I felt like I thought I could get it down to PG-13 and, economically, it actually works out better. But we didn’t go for it from the start.

Shock: Sam Raimi approached Drag Me to Hell in a similar fashion and they had two cuts, but ultimately they went for PG-13, yet it still didn’t catch on. What’s your stance – does rating matter?

Goyer: On one hand, you’re going to have the people who want a more hardcore, graphic film. I read the Internet chatter, and when they released the rating of The Unborn they were disappointed it wasn’t R. So I guess their reasoning is that it can’t be scary if it’s not R. On the other hand, you have the whole group of people who can’t legally see it if it’s R. So, there’s no question that PG-13 horror films historically do bigger than R rated films at the box office. If I had felt we had to hack out fifteen minutes or whole sequences then I would have said, “It’s R and so be it.” But I felt in this case, we were pretty close to PG-13 so let’s go for it.

Shock: Why didn’t you contribute a commentary?

Goyer: I go back and forth on commentaries. I’ve done a lot before. But this time there was a time decision because the period they wanted me to do it, I was in the middle of directing my pilot for NBC and it actually became physically impossible. I was shooting for a month and there was a period they had to lock it up or not. We had that discussion and there was just no way to do it. Which is not to say that we can’t do a commentary at a later date and release another version of it.

Shock: True. Well, I missed the Goyer on Goyer conversation that you had done for Blade: Trinity.

Goyer: I know, I know. It all just became impossible to schedule.

Shock: How are things on Flash Forward?

Goyer: So far so good. We’ve written the next six or seven episodes and we’re getting ready to shoot the rest of the series in a couple of weeks. It’s mayhem right now.